Myocardial perfusion and cardiovascular risk in patients with long-term ventricular pacing in the long period
https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2024.8.1.2086
Abstract
Aim. To study myocardial perfusion and assess cardiovascular risk in patients with long-term ventricular pacing in the long period.
Materials and methods. The study included 40 young patients (23 men and 17 women) with atrioventricular (AV) blocks and implanted pacemakers (pacers). Group 1 consisted of 20 patients with postoperative AV block after surgical correction of congenital heart disease; group 2–20 patients with non-surgical AV block. The age range at the time of the study was 22.8 (19.8; 24.0) years in group 1 and 22.5 (20.4; 24.8) years in group 2 (U = 181.0, p = 0.620). The duration of pacing in the groups was 15.5 (12.8; 18.9) years and 15.7 (14.1; 18.2) years, respectively (U = 193.0, p = 0.862). At the time of examination, all patients had a dual-chamber pacemaker implanted with 100 % ventricular pacing. All patients underwent a general clinical examination and single-photon emission computed tomography of the myocardium.
Results. Perfusion disorders were detected in 52.5 % of young patients with prolonged ventricular stimulation, regardless of the cause of AV block; in 25 % of the subjects they were pronounced. Transient LV myocardial ischemia was detected in 42.5 % of individuals included in the study. Significant myocardial ischemia (with an SDS value of > 4 points) in patients with prolonged ventricular stimulation, regardless of the cause of AV block, was accompanied by changes in volumetric parameters and impaired LV systolic function during exercise (Stress LV EDVI, Stress LV ESVI, Stress LV EF, ΔEF LV), myocardial systolic thickening (WT-SSS). Transient dilatation (especially in combination with myocardial ischemia) is an unfavorable risk factor for the development of cardiovascular events. A combination of stress-induced ischemia and the “stunning” phenomenon (with a decrease in LVEF by 5 % or more) was identified in 15 % of patients with prolonged ventricular stimulation, regardless of the cause of AV block, which is an independent predictor of the development of adverse cardiovascular events. A statistically significant relationship was established between the development of myocardial ischemia and the indicators of the difference (delta) in LV wall thickening (ΔWT-SDS) and the difference (delta) in LVEF (ΔLVEF) during the study at rest and during the stress test. A mathematical model has been proposed for calculating the probability of developing transient myocardial ischemia according to SPECT data with the inclusion of these indicators, the area of the ROC curve was AUC = 0.854 ((95 % CI 0.707 – 0.946), p < 0.001, sensitivity 81.8 %, specificity 72.4 %).
Conclusion. In young patients with prolonged ventricular stimulation, regardless of the cause of AV block, significant perfusion disturbances, stress-induced transient ischemia in combination with the phenomenon of “stunning” (decrease in LVEF ≥ 5 %), which were accompanied by remodeling and impairment of LV systolic function during load. The identified perfusion disorders may be significant predictors of adverse cardiovascular events in this population.
About the Authors
A. HarypauBelarus
Minsk
I. Patsiayuk
Belarus
Minsk
V. Terehov
Belarus
Minsk
References
1. Ansheles A.A., Sergiyenko V.B. Yadernaya kardiologiya [Nuclear cardiology]. Publ. of the FSBI “NMRC of Cardiology” of the Ministry of Health of Russia. Moscow: 2021. 516 p. (in Russian).
2. Lishmanov Yu.B., Chernov V.I. Natsionalnoye rukovodstvo po radionuklidnoy diagnostike [National Guide to Radionuclide Diagnostics]. Tomsk: STT, 2010, in 2 vol. - 418 p. (in Russian).
3. Ansheles A.A., Sergienko V.B. Perfuziya miokarda: chto ponimayetsya pod etim terminom pri vizualizatsii razlichnymi metodami luchevoy diagnostiki? [Myocardial perfusion: what is meant by this term when visualized by various methods of radiological diagnostics?]. Cardiologiya, 2017; vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 5-12. doi: 10.18087/cardio.2017.7.10000. (in Russian).
4. Lishmanov Yu.B., Zavadovsky K.V., Efimova N.Yu., Krivonogov N.G., Efimova I.Yu., et al. Vozmozhnosti yadernoy meditsiny v diagnostike serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevaniy [Possibilities of nuclear medicine in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases]. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal (Tomsk), 2015, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 21-29. (in Russian).
5. McDonagh T.A., Metra M., Adamo M., Gardner R.S., Baumbach A., et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021, vol. 42, no. 36, pp. 3599–3726. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.
6. Baumgartner H., De Backer J., Babu-Narayan S.V., Budts W., Chessa M., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J, 2021, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 563-645. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa554.
7. Knuuti J., Wijns W., Saraste A., Capodanno D., Barbato E., et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J, 2020, vol. 41, no. 3, pp.407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.
8. Glikson M., Nielsen J.C., Kronborg M.B., Michowitz Y., Auricchio A., et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J, 2021, vol. 42, no. 35, pp. 3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364.
9. Wang X.-H., Li M.-D., Xie F.-X., Liang H., Yang L., Wei X.-F., Pang H., Wang Z.-J., Jing X.-G. Prognostic utility of 99mTc-MIBI single photon emission computerized tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Front. Cardiovasc Med, 2023, vol. 10, pp. 1115135. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1115135.
10. Chung M.K., Patton K.K., Lau C.P., Dal Forno A.R.J., Al-Khatib S.M., et al. 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure. J Arrhythm, 2023, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 681-756. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12872.
11. Dorbala S., Ananthasubramaniam K., Armstrong I.S., Chareonthaitawee P., DePuey E.G., et al. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol, 2018, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1784-1846. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y.
12. Sergienko V.B., Ansheles A.A., Shulgin D.N. Perfuzionnaya stsintigrafiya i OEKTmiokarda (metodicheskiye rekomendatsii) [Perfusion scintigraphy and SPECT of the myocardium (methodological recommendations)]. Kardiologicheskiy vestnik: byulleten Rossiyskogo kardiologicheskogo nauchno-proizvodstvennogo kompleksa, 2015, vol. 2, pp. 6-21. (in Russian).
13. Ansheles A.A., Sergienko V.B., Interpretatsiya perfuzionnoy OEKT miokarda s KT-korrektsiyey pogloshcheniya. Chast II [Interpretation of myocardial perfusion SPECT with CT uptake correction. Part II]. Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii, 2020, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-18. doi: 10.20862/0042-4676-2020-101-1-6-18. (in Russian).
14. Alexanderson, E. et al., eds. Nuclear Cardiology: Guidance on the Implementation of SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging. IAEA Human Health Series No. 23 (Rev. 1). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2016, 101 р.
15. Ryzhkova D.V. Perfuzionnaya stsintigrafiya miokarda [Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy] Kardiologiya: Novosti. Mneniya. Obucheniye, 2016, vol. 4, no.11, pp. 76-86. (in Russian).
16. Kiehl E. L., Makki T., Kumar R., Gumber D., Kwon D.H., et al. Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function. Heart Rhythm, 2016, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 2272-2278. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.027.
17. Naqvi T.Z., Chao C.J. Adverse effects of right ventricular pacing on cardiac function: prevalence, prevention and treatment with physiologic pacing. Trends Cardiovasc Med, 2023, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 109-122. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2021.10.013.
18. Khurwolah M.R., Yao J., Kong X.Q. Adverse consequences of right ventricular apical pacing and novel strategies to optimize left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Curr Cardiol Rev, 2019, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 145-155. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666181129161839.
19. Sweeney M.O., Prinzen F.W. A new paradigm for physiologic ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.029.
20. Tse H.-F., Lau C.P., Nielsen T.T., Pedersen A.K, Andersen H.R. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997, vol. 29, pp. 744-749. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00586-4.
21. Nielsen J.C., Bottcher M., Nielsen T.T., Pedersen A.K., Andersen H.R. Regional myocardial blood flow in patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to long-term single chamber or dual chamber pacing – effect of pacing mode and rate. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000, vol. 35, pp. 1453-1461. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00593-3.
22. Tse H.F., Yu C., Wong K.K., Tsang V., Leung Y.L., Ho W.Y., Lau C.P. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1451-1458. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02169-1.
23. Тen Cate T.J., Van Hemel N.M., Verzijlbergen J.F. Myocardial perfusion defects in right ventricular apical pacing are caused by partial volume effects because of wall motion abnormalities: a new model to study gated myocardial SPECT with the pacemaker on and off. Nucl Med Commun, 2009, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 480-484. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32832b9a45.
24. Das K.J., Patel C.D., Sharma G., Naik N., Singh H. Detection of perfusion abnormalities in patients with permanent pacemakers on stress-rest 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: comparison between right ventricular apex and right ventricular outflow tract pacing. Nucl Med Commun, 2016, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 406-411. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000472.
25. Partington S.L., Valente A.M., Landzberg M., Grant F., Di Carli M.F., Dorbala S. Clinical applications of radionuclide imaging in the evaluation and management of patients with congenital heart disease. J Nucl Cardiol, 2016, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 45-63. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0185-5.
26. Sobic-Saranovic D.P., Pavlovic S.V., Jovanovic I.V., Stefanovic I.D., Artiko V.M., Djukic M.M., Obradovic V.B. Evaluation of myocardial perfusion and function by gated single-photon emission computed tomography technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile in children and adolescents with severe congenital heart disease. Nucl Med Commun, 2010, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 12-21. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283295622.
27. Crean A., Ahmed F.; Motwani M. The Role of Radionuclide Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease. Curr. Cardiovasc. Imaging Rep, 2017, vol. 10, p. 38. doi: 10.1007/s12410-017-9434-0; Executive Summary. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol, 2019, vol. 73, pp. 1494–1563.
28. Venet M., Friedberg M.K., Mertens L., Baranger J., Jalal Z., Tlili G., Villemain O. Nuclear Imaging in Pediatric Cardiology: Principles and Applications. Front Pediatr, 2022, vol. 10, p. 909994. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.909994.
29. Partington S.L., Valente A.M., Bruyere J.Jr., Rosica D., Shafer K.M., Landzberg M.J., Taqueti V.R., Blankstein R., Skali H., Kwatra N., DiCarli M.F., Grant F.D., Dorbala S. Reducing radiation dose from myocardial perfusion imaging in subjects with complex congenital heart disease. J Nucl Cardiol, 2021, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1395-1408. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01811-y.
30. McLeod K.A. Cardiac pacing in infants and children. Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2010, vol. 96, no. 18, pp. 1502–1508. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.173328.
31. Czaja M., Wygoda Z., Duszańska A., Szczerba D., Głowacki J., Gąsior M., Wasilewski J.P. Interpreting myocardial perfusion scintigraphy using single-photon emission computed tomography. Part 1. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol, 2017, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 192-199. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2017.70534.
32. Czaja M.Z., Wygoda Z., Duszańska A., Szczerba D., Głowacki J., Gąsior M., Wasilewski J.P. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy - interpretation of gated imaging. Part 2. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol, 2018, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49-56. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2018.74676.
33. Lester D., El-Hajj S., Farag A.A., Bhambhvani P., Tauxe L., Heo J., Iskandrian A.E., Hage F.G. Prognostic value of transient ischemic dilation with regadenoson myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol, 2016, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1147-1155. doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0272-7.
34. Mut F., Giubbini R., Vitola J., Lusa L., Sobic-Saranovic D., et al. Detection of post-exercise stunning by early gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: Results from the IAEA multi-center study. J. Nucl. Cardiol, 2014, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1168–1176. doi:10.1007/s12350-014-9983-4.
35. Bestetti A., Cuko B., Decarli A., Galli A., Lombardi F. Additional value of systolic wall thickening in myocardial stunning evaluated by stress-rest gated perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol, 2019, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. :833-840. doi:10.1007/s12350-017-1115-5.
36. Johnson L.L., Verdesca S.A., Aude W.Y., Xavier R.C., Nott L.T., Campanella M.W., Germano G. Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1641-1648. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00388-4.
37. Petix N.R., Sestini S., Marcucci G., Coppola A., Arena A., Nassi F., Taiti A., Guarnaccia V., Mennuti A., Mazzoni V. Can the reversible regional wall motion abnormalities on stress gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT predict a future cardiac event? J Nucl Cardiol, 2005, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 20-31. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.09.017.
38. Dona M., Massi L., Settimo L., Bartolini M., Giannì G., Pupi A., Sciagrà R. Prognostic implications of post-stress ejection fraction decrease detected by gated SPECT in the absence of stress-induced perfusion abnormalities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 201, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 485-90. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1643-6.
39. Bestetti A., Cuko B., Gasparini M., De Servi S. Better characterization of dipyridamole-induced myocardial stunning by systolic wall thickening. A gated perfusion SPECT study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 137-146. doi:10.1007/s12350-018-1340-6.
Review
For citations:
Harypau A., Patsiayuk I., Terehov V. Myocardial perfusion and cardiovascular risk in patients with long-term ventricular pacing in the long period. Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal. 2024;8(1):2086-2097. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2024.8.1.2086