Independent predictors of low-cardiac output syndrome in the early postoperative period in CAD patients: the role of modern biomarkers
https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2022.6.2.1681
Abstract
Cardiac biomarkers are recommended to stratify the risk of surgery in general surgical practice, but their adoption in cardiac surgery patients is limited. The aim of our study is assessing the prognostic possibility and predictive significance of modern cardiac-specific biomarkers (NT-proBNP, sST-2, hsTn-I, Galectin-3, hsCRP and IL-6) in the determining of patient-oriented treatment strategies. In the open prospective cohort study 352 patients with moderate or severe functional ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) were included. The inclusion criteria in the study were the reduced myocardial contractility (LV EF < 40%) in chronic CAD patients. CABG combined with mitral valve repair was performed in 239 patients (67.9%), mitral valve replacement in 35 patients (9.9%), and isolated in 78 patients (22.2%). The primary end-point of the study was defined as a complicated postoperative period with worsening of heart failure. Complicated postoperative period has been registered in 80 patients (22.7% of cases). The complicated early postoperative period did not relate to surgical strategies (χ2 = 0.398, p = 0.528). We didn’t find any difference in the degree of left ventricle (LV) remodeling between patients with complicated or not postoperative course (mean LV EDD – 68.2 mm, LV ESD – 56.3 mm, iEDV – 118.9 ml/m2 and iESV – 81.2 ml/m2, p > 0.05). By contrast, all of the used pre-operative biomarker tests differed in the examined groups of patients (p < 0,001). The complicated postoperative course was observed in 24.6% of cases with isolated elevation of NT-proBNP > 136 pg/ml, in 44.4% of cases with isolated elevation of sST2 > 35.8 ng/ml, and 59.3% of cases in combined increase in thresholds and sST2 and NT-proBNP (χ2 = 71.67, p = 0.001). The highest quality of the model and the estimate forecast of the postoperative low-output syndrome was measured for sST2 and NT-proBNP biomarkers (AUC = 0,792, 95% CI 0,709–0,846). The inclusion of both thresholds of sST2 and NT-proBNP retained their reliable influence on the forecast, with the model showed a high level of consent (79.7% of correctly recognized cases).
References
1. Mebazaa, A., Pitsis, A. A., Rudiger, A., et al (2010). Clinical review: practical recommendations on the management of perioperative heart failure in cardiac surgery. Critical care (London, England), 14(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8153
2. Nashef, S. A., Roques, F., Sharples, L. D., Nilsson, J., Smith, C., Goldstone, A. R., & Lockowandt, U. (2012). EuroSCORE II. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 41(4), 734–745. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs043
3. Halvorsen, S., Mehilli, J., Cassese, S., Hall, T. S., … Touyz, R. M. (2022). 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. European heart journal, 43(39), 3826–3924. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270.
4. Dolapoglu, A., Avci, E., Yildirim, T., Kadi, H., & Celik, A. (2019). Using Soluble ST2 to Predict Adverse Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Impaired Left Ventricular Function Undergoing Coronary Bypass Surgery. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 55(9), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55090572
5. Patel, D. M., Thiessen-Philbrook, H., Brown, J. R., McArthur, E., Moledina, D. G., Mansour, S. G., Shlipak, M. G., Koyner, J. L., Kavsak, P., Whitlock, R. P., Everett, A. D., Malenka, D. J., Garg, A. X., Coca, S. G., & Parikh, C. R. (2020). Association of plasmasoluble ST2 and galectin-3 with cardiovascular events and mortality following cardiac surgery. American heart journal, 220, 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2019.11.014
6. Ramkumar, N., Jacobs, J. P., Berman, R. B., Parker, D. M., MacKenzie, T. A., Likosky, D. S., DiScipio, A., Malenka, D. J., & Brown, J. R. (2019). Cardiac Biomarkers Predict Long-term Survival After Cardiac Surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery, 108(6), 1776–1782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.123
7. Heidenreich, P. A., Bozkurt, B., Aguilar, D., … Yancy, C. W. (2022). 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 79(17), 1757–1780. ht tps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.011
8. Taub, P. R., Daniels, L. B., & Maisel, A. S. (2009). Usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide levels in predicting hemodynamic and clinical decompensation. Heart failure clinics, 5(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2008.11.009
Review
For citations:
Shumavets V. Independent predictors of low-cardiac output syndrome in the early postoperative period in CAD patients: the role of modern biomarkers. Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal. 2022;6(2):1681-1687. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2022.6.2.1681