Results of estimation arterial blood pressure indices in patients after cholecystectomy
https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2022.6.2.1611
Abstract
Background. In view of the changes in the pathogenetic vector towards the study of comorbidity, searching for the ways of cardiovascular risk reduction is still relevant nowadays in specific subgroups of patients with moderate, unusual or undetectable risk levels (for example, in patients with accompanying acute surgical diseases of the abdominal cavity)
Aim. Evaluation of arterial blood pressure indices in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis.
Material and methods. The main group consisted of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis who underwent urgent cholecystectomy and were administered cardioprotective therapy (acetylsalicylic acid and atorvastatin). The first comparison group was formed from patients who underwent urgent cholecystectomy, but did not received cardioprotective therapy. The second comparison group was formed from patients who received cardioprotective therapy, but did not undergo cholecystectomy.
Results and discussion. As a result of the study, the prevalence of patients with arterial hypertension (HTN) in the cohort was revealed. 72% of in-patients had elevated blood pressure (BP) on admission to the surgical department. Despite the positive results on the HTN control at the inpatient stage, the second follow-up revealed hypertensive BP profiles in most patients in the late postoperative period. The analysis of hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the late postoperative period also revealed the predominance of hypertensive blood pressure profiles in patients in all study groups.
Conclusion. Development of ACS emerged in circumstances of poor HTN control.
About the Author
D. Herasimionak
Belarusian State Medical University, Department of Cardiology and Internal Diseases
Belarus
Belarus
Minsk
References
1. Chaudhry W., Mylan C. Cohen Cardiac Screening in the Noncardiac Surgery Patient. Surgical Clinics of North America, 2017, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 717–732.
2. Weiser T.G., Regenbogen S.E., Thompson K.D., Haynes A.B., Lipsitz S.R., Berry W.R., Gawande A.A. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modeling strategy based on available data. Lancet, 2008, vol. 372, pp. 139–144.
3. Kritharides L. Preoperative assessment: a cardiologist’s perspective. Aust Prescr, 2014, vol. 37, pp. 188–191.
4. Piepoli M.F., Hoes A.W., Agewall S., Albus C., Brotons C., Catapano A.L., Cooney M.-T., Corrà U., Cosyns B., Deaton C., Graham I., Hall M.S. et al. Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J, 2016, vol. 37, no. 29, pp. 2315–2381.
5. Devereaux P.J., Sessler D.I. Cardiac complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med, 2015, vol. 373, pp. 2258–2269.
6. The Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) Study Investigators. Association between complications and death within 30 days after noncardiac surgery. CMAJ, 2019, vol. 191(30), pp. E830–E837.
7. International Surgical Outcomes Study group. Global patient outcomes after elective surgery; prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth, 2016, vol. 117(5), pp. 601–609.
Review
For citations:
Herasimionak D. Results of estimation arterial blood pressure indices in patients after cholecystectomy. Emergency Cardiology and Cardiovascular Risks journal. 2022;6(2):1611-1614. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51922/2616-633X.2022.6.2.1611
Views:
6
Email this article 